Basically, people who are asked by researchers to fantasize about coitus with a stranger become better at detail-oriented analytical thinking, while those who are asked to think about a romantic walk with their chosen partner become better at the sort of creative thinking which brings together disparate ideas.
Our first thought: This explains a lot about science-fiction writing, and especially about the math-heavy, research-based sub-genre known as (ahem) "hard s/f."
Our second thought: What does this say about the masters of logical, analytical theology -- the systematicians? Hmmm?
Oh, brother. You are bad. web
ReplyDeleteI just had two ideas rattling around in my head, and they magically came together. And in my own defense, two words: Paul Tillich.
ReplyDeleteOf course, I might have also asked what this says about actual scientists, including those who wind up in sensitive church posts. If you see what I mean.